You are talking to players that still play a variant of RuneScape

So tbh, it is likely that they could've made complex supervisors, as a good deal of bosses in RS3 are not even complex and cheap RuneScape gold do not even attempt to drive what EoC can perform. They barely scratch on the surface. So really, the majority of the bosses we've had could have readily been created for the combat system. I think the true bosses that really push EoC to reveal how great it can be are Solak, ambassador, Telos and vorago (although he can be carried out in legacy, but he is nonetheless a fantastic boss to flaunt defensives). They need to make supervisors like them. AoD didn't hit that mark and it shows with even a newish pvmer with a t90 can perform her in a 7 man and she is.

It is time to take the fact that Eoc was a loser. We had been advised that Eoc would revolutionise combat and lead to a huge burst in popularity as gamers from other games with modern combat would come play RS3 (it did not occur at all), and preexisting gamers could enjoy it (it did not happen at all either, we dropped 80% of our player base). OSRS' top pvmers get tens of thousands of viewers whenever a new boss comes out. RS3 pvmers are fortunate to have a few hundred in peak times, largely. Despite the fact that RS3 has better graphics and a combat system that is far more sophisticated.

The simple fact that the majority of players in EoC use Revolution instead of full manual is a statistic shared by J Mods on multiple streams.

Individuals left when EOC released since it was confusing and not entirely developed. EOC is currently much better than it was on launch. PvP from the sense also hurts that fights are shorter. From speaking with OSRS players visiting RS3 for the bossing, they usually like EOC since it increases battle complexity (if doing revo or guide ) while also using an easy option now (revo++). Ability bars have been figured out making it less confusing since you may look up a pub that was good.

You are talking to players that still play a variant of RuneScape. Talk to the players that have completely stop RuneScape (both versions) and they may tell you different. Myself and 4 of my friends quit due to EoC and don't like EoC in its current state. Absurd MTX is just an extra reason to never play with RuneScape. We refuse to play OSRS and RS3 because we prefer the 2011 era of RuneScape where the graphics were adequate and Soul Split made work of Slayer tasks that are dull. Not modern day"switch 3 times in 3 successive ticks to protect against this 1 boss attack" or the older school"bring half a list of prayer potions to finish this garbage mob task".

For their own, and it is clear that there are people that love both games in their current state, but my friend group has had many, many failed attempts at getting back to version of RuneScape.Switchscape is actually just something for maximizing boss times and useful most with the highest end bosses in RS3. But you need to recognize the higher end bosses are for high end players. They are supposed to challenge individuals who locate bossing too simple. They ought to require knowledge and rotations of mechanics. That said, many can be beaten with just eating of food and maybe bringing a friend to include dps. Slayer jobs in RS3 tend to also be relatively simple with most being rewarding and afk. Obviously, you may not enjoy it and that is okay. I never liked the death price of RS3 nor the facet. I am currently trying ESO in regards to rs2007 gold non-combat abilities, which I enjoy less, although more in terms of combat.